A thinner cow is not yet a graceful doe. Secrets of a sexy appearance

A thinner cow is not yet a graceful doe. Secrets of a sexy appearance.

With this fashion for losing weight, it’s just some kind of mass psychosis, honestly. Moreover, it covered exclusively the female half of humanity. Why, one might ask, should women be thin? What's the trick? Is weight really the ultimate goal?! Noooo!!!Weight loss is not a goal for women, it’s a means! A reliable and centuries-tested means of achieving a completely different goal - conquering men! I immediately foresee a lot of objections to this. Well, like... “I want to like myself!”, “I want to be no worse than other women!”, “I want to wear any clothes!” Someone else will probably say: “All successful women have a beautiful figure!” - or - “Normal weight is the key to health!” But all this, I assure you, is “la-la”! Related, but not the main meanings. As old man Freud argued, everything in our lives is implicated in sex. Therefore, no matter what women say, first of all, they evaluate their own figure from the position of men, that is, they view themselves through their eyes. After all, you really want to excite and enchant, to conquer and knock off your feet, to make you suffer and admire with just your appearance.

Here it is appropriate to exclaim: “Dear women! But it’s not just about the kilograms!!!” Or perhaps even not in them at all? Do not agree?! Most likely, because you are at the mercy of typical female misconceptions. I suggest you part with them immediately.

Misconception 1. Men's addictions.

Who said that men always love thin women? Not at all! Men are always attracted to a woman's figure - form, that is, something in relation to which the term "thin" is completely inappropriate. Remember what epithets men use when describing a desirable woman. Lush breasts, delicious ass, rounded hips. On the other hand, this, of course, does not mean that a woman can blur to exorbitant sizes. And, by the way, precisely because then nothing can be said about the forms at all, they will simply disappear due to the shapelessness of the figure. So what is the conclusion? Don't worry about weight, but about the harmonious proportion of your shape!

Misconception 2. Beauty standards.

Each time (and country, by the way!) has its own standards of beauty. The ideal is very conditional and is determined not by something unshakable, approved once and for all, but by a necessity that is completely understandable for a given time and given area. In the 19th century, large forms were valued. This was considered the main sign of a “healthy body.” And the continuation of a healthy family was of enormous importance in the era of epidemics, poor heredity (due to incest) and underdeveloped medicine. The magnificent ideal was dictated by a deep natural instinct. In recent years, the ideal has been exactly the opposite. Skinny, flat, shapeless models walk the catwalks. And this, too, they say, is caused by a rather prosaic reason - the lack of developed forms makes it easier for fashion designers to sew clothes.

And how many standards Hollywood has invented! There is generally an eternal swing from one extreme to another. For clarity, put sex symbols of different eras next to each other: Marilyn Monroe and Mila Jovovich. What does all this mean? Never compare yourself to someone, discover and competently present your own unique appearance!

Misconception 3. The concept of “normal weight”.

Everyone knows about the different formulas for calculating normal weight, which take into account age, height and gender. But why is the individual constitution not yet taken into account, namely muscle and bone mass? After all, these are very important and essential indicators for calculating weight. And in general, think about how the concept of “norm” is formed? What are its criteria? What are they defined in relation to? And who actually installed them?

Everyone knows how “normal vision” is defined. Have you ever wondered whether this notorious check table is compiled correctly? What if there are a lot of people who see smaller symbols than those in the last row? Or, say, if there are those who can see all these letters from a more distant distance