Kreutzfuchs Phenomenon

Kreutzfuchs Phenomenon is a phenomenon that was discovered by Austrian radiologist Otto Kreutzfurs in 1920. Kreutzfus was one of the first researchers of X-rays and actively used them to diagnose various diseases.

During his research, Kreutzfuss noticed that under certain conditions, X-rays could penetrate skin and bone, creating unusual images. He called this phenomenon the “Kreuzfuss phenomenon” after his name.

The Kreutzfuss phenomenon involves x-rays passing through the skin and other soft tissue to create images of internal organs and bones. This allows doctors to diagnose diseases in the early stages, before symptoms appear.

However, the Kreutzfuss phenomenon also has its limitations. First, X-rays are hazardous to health, so they should be used with caution and only when absolutely necessary. Secondly, to obtain high-quality images, you need to properly configure the device and choose the right shooting angle.

Despite its shortcomings, the Kreutzfuss phenomenon continues to be used in medicine and other fields where it is necessary to obtain images of internal organs and bones with high accuracy. Today this method is widely used in dentistry, orthopedics, gynecology and other areas of medicine.



**Creutzfluis Phenomenon** is a scientific phenomenon associated with the existence of a particularly large focus of excitation in the patient’s cerebral cortex in the presence of a primary pathological focus, namely after its destruction by electroconvulsive therapy. This phenomenon was described by psychiatrist and neurologist David M. Braziel in 2016.

**Circumstances for observing the phenomenon:** Kreuzflihs first described it in 1943, observing twelve patients with quadriplegia. However, real scientific interest in this mysterious phenomenon attracted Braizil from the University of Gothenburg. He tested whether a patient could be taught to walk again after suppressing brain seizures with ECT. Dr. Brazeal believed that the restoration of motor abilities in weakened limbs could be caused by these same electroconvulsive impulses. To support his theory, in the 21st century he conducted control experiments after similar brain lesions in 40 patients who were tested shortly after surgery, as well as in forty-six patients after ECT, using neurophysiological techniques to analyze neural activity in the brain. The results of the study showed that in both cases the same connection was identified between the emerging epileptic paroxysm and secondary improvement in