Voyno-Yasenetskogo Resection Clear

Pelvic resection according to Voino-Yasenetsky is a surgical operation to remove part of the pelvic bones, developed and first used by the outstanding Russian surgeon and Archbishop Luka Voino-Yasenetsky.

The purpose of this intervention is radical removal of the tumor lesion involving the pelvic bones. The operation is highly complex and requires the surgeon to have outstanding skills and knowledge of pelvic anatomy.

Voino-Yasenetsky first performed such a pelvic resection in 1928. His technique involved removing the greater trochanter of the femur along with adjacent areas of the pelvic bones. This made it possible to remove the tumor as radically as possible and prevent its recurrence.

Resection of the pelvis according to Voino-Yasenetsky is still considered the standard operation for neoplasms of the pelvic bones. It demonstrates the highest surgical skill of its author and has gone down in history as one of the classic operations in oncology and traumatology.

Voino-yasenensky resection is a surgical operation on the pelvic organs, which is used to remove tumor tumors, ore gland tumors, and ovarian cysts. According to most researchers, this operation should be used as a last resort, as an exception, while not being the main method of treating most gynecological diseases; in most cases, patients can and should be treated conservatively. The operation is more preferable when removing large tumors or ore gland formations. However, it should be noted that the use of this operation requires a highly qualified doctor (higher medical education, extensive surgical experience). This entails high economic costs and significantly increases the risk of surgical complications.

You and I know very well that in ancient times treatment and surgery were also focused on working with the body, but today this direction has developed mainly in the direction of drug treatment, this is one of the manifestations of the general increase in attention to preventive measures, and sometimes simply recommendations to do nothing. Of course, this development is legitimate; each area of ​​medicine has its own advantages and boundaries, beyond which its development becomes extremely dangerous for the patient. In our opinion, the most dangerous are the refusal of any kind of surgical treatment with the expansion of the scope of drug therapy in relatively healthy patients, and the recommendation that patients refuse to undergo a certain type of surgical treatment for a serious problem,