Kretschmer Hypobulic Mechanisms

Kretschmer Hypobulic Mechanisms: Description and Research

Kretschmer's hypobulic mechanisms are a concept that was developed by German psychiatrist Ernst Kretschmer in 1921. This concept is associated with the study of body types and their influence on the development of mental disorders.

Kretschmer formulated three body types: asthenic, picnic and athletic. Asthenics have a thin bone structure, short stature and weak muscles. Picnics, on the contrary, have a massive build, short stature and wide bones. The athletic type is characterized by strong muscles and tall stature.

Kretschmer suggested that each body type is associated with certain mental characteristics. Thus, asthenics, in his opinion, are prone to anxiety, self-doubt and depression. Picnics, on the contrary, are more confident in themselves and their capabilities, but are prone to aggression and selfishness. The athletic type, according to Kretschmer, is the most balanced, emotionally stable and capable of leadership.

However, it should be noted that Kretschmer's concept has not received wide recognition among modern psychiatrists and psychologists. Many studies have shown that there is no connection between body type and mental disorders. In addition, body types are not static and can change throughout a person's life under the influence of various factors such as diet, physical activity and genetic background.

However, Kretschmer's concept continues to attract the interest of researchers, with some suggesting that body types may be associated with certain mental characteristics, such as the risk of developing certain diseases or certain personality traits.

In conclusion, it can be said that Kretschmer's concept of hypobulic mechanisms remains an interesting topic for research and discussion in the scientific community. However, further research and analysis is required to fully understand the relationship between body types and mental characteristics.

Kretschmer Hypobulic Mechanisms Introduction In his search for the causes of illness, Kretschmer proposed a theory of mental dysontogenesis of types, or constitutional-constitutional concepts, based on his ability to recognize the psychological and biological characteristics of patients, depending on the structure of the body and the nervous system. One of the most striking aspects of criticism of Kretschmer's theory was that it lacked the idea of ​​a direct mechanism between the biological substrate and psychological manifestations. The theory also assumed an arbitrary difference in the nature of the disease, which could not be explained by biology or even specific physiological