Corruption In Cancer Research

Introduction

The article discusses the problem of corruption and conflict of interest in cancer research in particular. These are two examples of the "intellectual sign of civic evil" as discussed in For Your Health.

Description of Problem

The specific problem addressed in the paper is conflict of interest. This is a phenomenon that occurs when research findings or research participants' objectives are influenced by personal or financial interests. In cancer research, this can include collaborations with pharmaceutical companies that aim to promote the development of new drugs or promotions of ancillary products such as test kits. Other examples include the use of private foundations or grant money to support research projects that align with their goals or promote personnel retention. University endowments and other sources of infrastructure funding can be similarly impacted. How Does Conflict of Interest Affect Cancer Research? The specific examples of how conflict of interest may corrupt cancer research include, but are not limited to the following: - Researchers "find" favorable effects for research funded by drug cartels to increase the likelihood of publication, since their continuing association with industry could discourage them to challenge or refute results for fear of job loss or sanctions. - Conflicts of interest can even alter perspectives in patients’ perceptions of alternative treatments. Direct industry contributions to charitable efforts can influence non-profits, leveraging inequality within healthcare markets and causing inefficiencies in overexpenses investment in secondary business models.

Conclusion

The last point in the research highlights a possible cycle where conflict of interest within the industry itself contributes to the need for further corruption to hold it together. To reach solutions, the solutions must address existing social structures and reproducing patterns. For example, changes in tax incentives may help both the long-term future of stakeholders through improved innovation while also reducing market proliferation of resources through diminishing extraneous administrative costs. This can simplify and conserve resources, resolve potential conflicts, and offer strides towards long-lasting inclusive benefits for all.