Parergasia

Parergasia is a linguistic term used to describe the phenomenon where the author of a text deliberately changes or distorts the meaning of words or phrases in order to create a certain effect or emphasis.

The term parergasia comes from the Greek words par- (re-) and ergasia (activity). It was introduced into scientific use by the German philologist and linguist Carl Friedrich von Savigny at the beginning of the 19th century.

Parergasia can manifest itself in different forms. For example, a writer might use synonyms to replace words to change their meaning or create a contrasting effect. He can also change the order of words in a sentence to enhance or weaken its meaning.

The purpose of parergasia is to create a certain impression on the reader or listener. For example, in advertising or political rhetoric, parergasia can be used to create an image of a strong and confident leader or product.

However, the use of parergasia can lead to a distortion of the meaning of the text and the creation of a false idea about an object or idea. Therefore, when using parergasia, you must be careful and ensure that you do not distort the meaning of the statement.

Parergazina. What is this? This is something that disrupts the process of a particular activity, namely, it acts contrary to the desires and intentions of the subject of the activity. In this case, it, occurring in the process of activity itself or preceding it, reduces its effectiveness or interrupts its development until all the factors determining such actions are taken into account. According to T. R. Gabdrakhmanov, parergazina is an action to the detriment of others and to the detriment of oneself. We will try to give a more detailed definition of parergasine.

Unlike a parasite, which lives at the expense of the owner and “causes him suffering,” Parergasin deprives the subject himself of the activity in which he participates, uses him as a tool to achieve his goals in one direction or another, and the actions of such a person are deception that causes damage , “destruction, contradiction to oneself, ethical in the value hierarchy, ignoring the essence of objective-practical activity, and is a consequence of the general deformation of a person with a high level of “free energy”, with the absence of “own cultural values ​​and traditions” [ibid.: 74]. In most cases, this is a rather complex multifaceted process of ignoring norms and