Monocentrism

Monocentrism: the theory of the origin of races

The theory of monocentrism states that modern man and all currently known races originated in a relatively small area and independently of each other. The main provisions of the theory of monocentric evolutionary origin of species belong to the French paleontologist Eugene Dubois (Du Buas) and are used in zoology to explain a wide range of features of modern animal species. Initial ideas about monocentrism were proposed at the Congress of the Pan-European Union of France Boucher de Penn, held in Paris in 1890, where the Belgian anatomist and paleontologist Pierre Weiss outlined his “theory of co-evolution”. In 1931, the famous essay by Carl Paul Fefermann and Lucien Lévy-Bruhl on a typological list of human kinships appeared. In the second half of the 20th century, French biologist, doctor of historical sciences, anthropologist and geographer Jean Joseph Tourquier. The theory of uniformity against the mechanical origin of ideas of nature along the “internal line” (preformism), which was considered a relic of phyletism. Monumental theorists opposed the later doctrine of cassowaryism (the mechanical creation of new species). - monogenism - an innately identical way of thinking and cognition for all people. - “modularity” is a phenomenon of consciousness when, on their basis, their own formations arise, identical to the center of the system.

Monocentrism: The Theory of the Origin of Races

Monocentrism is a theory that offers an explanation for the origin and development of human races. According to this theory, modern humans evolved from Neanderthals, and this process occurred in a relatively limited area of ​​the Earth. The emergence of various human races, according to monocentrists, occurred later, under the influence of settlement, isolation and other factors.

The main argument of monocentrism is the assumption that all modern races have a common origin and share a common ancestor. According to this theory, Neanderthals are this common ancestor, and it was they who became the starting point for the evolution of modern humans.

Monocentrists argue that the process of formation of different races occurred after the division of nomadic groups of people into different territories. Under such conditions, changes occurred in the genetic material, isolation of the group and exposure to environmental factors. These factors, according to monocentrists, led to the emergence of the different phenotypic characteristics that we see today in different races.

However, it is important to note that monocentrism is one of many theories and is not the only explanation for the origin of races. There are also other approaches such as polycentrism and multicentrism that offer alternative explanations for this issue.

Polycentrism, for example, suggests that races developed independently of each other in different regions of the world. This means that each race has its own ancestor, and these ancestors evolved in parallel in different parts of the world.

Another approach, multicentrism, believes that the origin of races is the result of the mixing of different groups of people and the combined influence of various factors, such as migration and genetic exchange.

Ultimately, the question of the origin and development of human races remains open and is subject to further research. Monocentrism represents one possible theory that attempts to explain this complex and multifaceted process, but more research and evidence is required to fully confirm or refute this hypothesis.